| Author |
Aphaporn Aksorngran |
| Title |
Topic continuity in expository
discourse / Aphaporn Aksorngran
|
| Date |
1995 |
| |
|
| Location |
CL thesis |
| Source |
88 leaves |
| Abstract |
This study aims at
studying linguistic forms used in the coding of continuity of discourse
which occur in the topic or subject position. The method proposed by Givon
(1983) is used to measure the continuity of these forms. Only two values
are measured : the look-back value and the persistence value. Data are
10 compositions written by vocational students on traffic problems. Seven
forms are found : zero pronoun, modified zero, pronoun, unmodified noun
phrase, modified noun phrase, unmodified noun phrase with topic marker
and modified noun phrase with topic marker. Each has different continuity
value. Zero pronoun has the greatest continuity with a look-back value
of 1.27 and a persistence value of 1.6. Unmodified noun phrase has the
least continuity, with a look-back value of 10.29 and a persistence value
of 1.5. Pronoun has a look-back value of 1.42 and a persistence value of
2.17. Modified zero has a look-back value of 2.86 and a persistence value
of 1. Modified noun phrase with topic marker has a look-back value of 5.83
and a persistence value of 2. Modified noun phrase has a look-back value
of 7.75 and a persistence value of 1.25. Unmodified noun phrase with topic
marker has a look-back value of 8.5 and a persistence value of 1.25 |
| |
¡ÒÃÇԨѤÃÑ駹Õé
ÁըشÁØè§ËÁÒÂà¾×èÍÇÔà¤ÃÒÐËìÃÙ»áÊ´§¤ÇÒÁµèÍà¹×èͧ¢Í§á¡è¹¤ÇÒÁ
ã¹·Ñȹ»ÃԨ੷㹵Óá˹è§á¡è¹¤ÇÒÁ
áÅÐ/ËÃ×Í »Ãиҹ
áÅÐËÒ¤èÒ¤ÇÒÁµèÍà¹×èͧ¢Í§ÃÙ»áÊ´§á¡è¹¤ÇÒÁ¨Ò¡¤èÒà©ÅÕè¢ͧ¤èÒÂé͹¡ÅѺ
áÅФèÒà©ÅÕè¢ͧ¤èÒÊ׺à¹×èͧ
¢Í§ ¡ÔÇ͹ (1983) à¾×èÍ´Ù¤ÇÒÁÅ´ËÅÑ蹢ͧ¤èÒ¤ÇÒÁµèÍà¹×èͧ
â´Âãªé¢éÍÁÙŨҡ¤ÇÒÁàÃÕ§»ÃÐàÀ·áÊ´§¤ÇÒÁ¤Ô´àËç¹àÃ×èͧ
"»ÑËÒ¡ÒèÃҨ÷ÕèÁռšÃзºµè͹ѡàÃÕ¹"
¢Í§¹Ñ¡àÃÕ¹ÍÒÂØ
16-18 »Õ ÇÔ·ÂÒÅÑÂÍÒªÕÇÐÈÖ¡ÉÒà«ç¹µì¨ÍËì¹
10 ¤ÇÒÁàÃÕ§
«Öè§ä´é¤Ñ´àÅ×Í¡â´Â¡ÒÃÊØèÁµÑÇÍÂèÒ§¨Ò¡¤ÇÒÁàÃÕ§·Ñé§ËÁ´
50 ¤ÇÒÁàÃÕ§
¼Å¡ÒÃÈÖ¡ÉÒ¾ºÇèÒÁÕÃÙ»áÊ´§á¡è¹¤ÇÒÁã¹·Ñȹ»ÃԨ੷
7 ª¹Ô´ ä´éá¡è
ÊØÃÙ» ÊØÃÙ»·ÕèÁÕ˹èÇ¢ÂÒÂÊÃþ¹ÒÁ
¹ÒÁÇÅÕ·ÕèäÁèÁÕ˹èÇ¢ÂÒÂ
¹ÒÁÇÅÕ·ÕèÁÕ˹èÇ¢ÂÒÂ
¹ÒÁÇÅÕ·ÕèÁÕ˹èÇÂáÊ´§á¡è¹¤ÇÒÁ
áÅÐ ¹ÒÁÇÅÕ·ÕèÁÕ˹èÇ¢ÂÒÂáÅÐ˹èÇÂáÊ´§á¡è¹¤ÇÒÁ
ÃÙ»áÊ´§á¡è¹¤ÇÒÁàËÅèÒ¹Õé
ÁÕ¤èÒ¤ÇÒÁµèÍà¹×èͧ·ÕèÅ´ËÅÑ蹡ѹ
¡ÅèÒǤ×Í ÊØÃÙ»à»ç¹ÃÙ»áÊ´§á¡è¹¤ÇÒÁ·ÕèÁÕ¤èÒ¤ÇÒÁµèÍà¹×èͧÁÒ¡·ÕèÊØ´
â´ÂÁÕ¤èÒà©ÅÕè¢ͧ¤èÒÂé͹¡ÅѺ
1.27 ¤èÒà©ÅÕè¢ͧ¤èÒÊ׺à¹×èͧ
1.6 áÅйÒÁÇÅÕ·ÕèäÁèÁÕ˹èÇ¢ÂÒÂà»ç¹ÃÙ»áÊ´§á¡è¹¤ÇÒÁ·ÕèÁÕ¤èÒ¤ÇÒÁµèÍà¹×èͧ¹éÍ·ÕèÊØ´
â´ÂÁÕ¤èÒà©ÅÕè¢ͧ¤èÒÂéÍÁ¡ÅѺ
10.29 ¤èÒà©ÅÕè¢ͧ¤èÒÊ׺à¹×èͧ
1.5 ÊèǹÃÙ»áÊ´§á¡è¹¤ÇÒÁÍÕ¡
5 ÃÙ» ÁÕ¤èÒ¤ÇÒÁµèÍà¹×èͧ«Öè§ÁÕ¤èÒà©ÅÕè¢ͧ¤èÒÂé͹¡ÅѺ
áÅФèÒà©ÅÕè¢ͧ¤èÒÊ׺à¹×èͧ
´Ñ§µèÍ仹Õé
ÊÃþ¹ÒÁ ÁÕ¤èÒà©ÅÕè¢ͧ¤èÒÂé͹¡ÅѺ
1.42 ÁÕ¤èÒà©ÅÕè¢ͧ¤èÒÊ׺à¹×èͧ
2.17 ÊØÃÙ»·ÕèÁÕ˹èÇ¢ÂÒÂ
ÁÕ¤èÒà©ÅÕè¢ͧ¤èÒÂé͹¡ÅѺ
2.86 ÁÕ¤èÒà©ÅÕè¢ͧ¤èÒÊ׺à¹×èͧ
1 ¹ÒÁÇÅÕ·ÕèÁÕ˹èÇ¢ÂÒÂáÅÐ˹èÇÂáÊ´§á¡è¹¤ÇÒÁ
ÁÕ¤èÒà©ÅÕè¢ͧ¤èÒÂé͹¡ÅѺ
5.83 ÁÕ¤èÒà©ÅÕè¢ͧ¤èÒÊ׺à¹×èͧ
2 ¹ÒÁÇÅÕ·ÕèÁÕ˹èÇ¢ÂÒÂ
ÁÕ¤èÒà©ÅÕè¢ͧ¤èÒÂé͹¡ÅѺ
7.75 ÁÕ¤èÒà©ÅÕè¢ͧ¤èÒÊ׺à¹×èͧ
1.5 áÅÐ ¹ÒÁÇÅÕ·ÕèÁÕ˹èÇÂáÊ´§á¡è¹¤ÇÒÁ
ÁÕ¤èÒà©ÅÕè¢ͧ¤èÒÂé͹¡ÅѺ
8.5 ÁÕ¤èÒà©ÅÕè¢ͧ¤èÒÊ׺à¹×èͧ
1.25 |
| Note |
Typescript (photocopy) |
| |
Thesis (M.A.)--Chulalongkorn
University, 1995 |
| Subject(s) |
Discourse analysis |
| |
Cohesion (Linguistics) |
| Alt author |
ÍÒÀÒÀóì
ÍÑ¡ÉáҨ¹ì |
| |
Peansiri Vongvipanond,
advisor |
| |
Chulalongkorn University.
Linguistics |
| ISBN |
9746328298 |