Pittayawat Pittayaporn Archives - Page 4 of 5 - Center of Excellence in Southeast Asian Linguistics

Pittayawat Pittayaporn

Selected Publications

Typologizing sesquisyllabicity: The role of structural analysis in the study of linguistic diversity in Mainland Southeast Asia

2015

Mainland Southeast Asia (MSEA), roughly comprising Laos, Vietnam, Cambodia, Thailand, Myanmar, northeast India, southern China, and peninsular Malaysia, has long been recognized as a linguistic area. In terms of linguistic diversity, it is an area with high phylogenetic diversity but very low structural diversity (Enfield 2011). With respect to phonology,

Genetic and linguistic correlation of the Kra-Dai-speaking groups in Thailand

2015

The Kra–Dai linguistic family includes Thai and Lao as well as a great number of languages spoken by ethnic minorities in Southeast Asia. In Thailand, a dozen of other Kra–Dai languages are spoken in addition to Thai, the national language. The genetic structure of the Kra–Dai-speaking populations in Thailand has

Layers of Chinese loanwords in Proto-Southwestern Tai as Evidence for the dating of the spread of Southwestern Tai

2014

The current ethno-linguistic landscape of mainland Southeast Asia is a result of the spread of Tai speakers from southern China. This study examines Chinese loanwords in Proto-Southwestern Tai, the hypothetical ancestor of all modern Southwestern Tai varieties and proposes a dating of the spread of Southwestern Tai languages. By comparing

Kra-Dai Languages

2014

Kra-Dai (also called Tai-Kadai and Kam-Tai) is a family of approximately 100 languages spoken in Southeast Asia, extending from the island of Hainan, China, in the east to the Indian province of Assam in the west and south to the Malay Peninsula. The term Kra-Dai was suggested in Weera Ostapirat’s

Periphrastic causative constructions in Patani Malay

2014

This paper discusses periphrastic causative constructions in Patani Malay, which is a Malay dialect spoken in Thailand’s Deep South. The result shows that Patani Malay has three types of periphrastic causative constructions, namely waʔ ‘do’ construction, wi ‘give’ construction and waʔwi construction. Compared to Indonesian, Malaysian Colloquial Malay and Eastern

Reconstruction of Proto-Tai negators

2014

Based on comparative data from 64 modern Tai varieties, we propose that Proto-Tai had three distinct negators, namely *ɓawB, *mi and *pajB. These morphemes were distinguished from each other in terms of aspect. Moreover, we show that the Old Thai language represented by the literary classic Lilit Phra Lo, and

Tonal Developments and Southwestern Tai Subgrouping

2013

This article evaluates the use of tonal development as criteria for Southwestern Tai subgrouping. A literature review shows that Brown (1965) and Chamberlain (1975), the two most influential proposals, both use tonal splits and mergers as main criteria. However, this approach is not consistent with the shared-innovation method used in

Phonologically-constrained change: The role of the foot in monosyllabization and rhythmic shifts in Mainland Southeast Asia

2012

Changes in word shapes in Mainland Southeast Asia are usually attributed to contact-induced typological convergence. However, little attention has been paid to the role of structural constraints in defining paths of change. In this paper, we describe two distributional gaps in paths of word shape shifts: (1) there are no

Establishing relative chronology of Palaung sound changes using Tai loanwords

2009

The sequence in which different sound changes occur in a language can beestablished by identifying feeding/bleeding relationship among the changes. Inmany cases, however, it is not possible to establish the relative chronologyamong certain changes because they are not in either feeding or bleedingrelationships. The chronology of changes from Proto-Palaung to

Proto-Southwestern Tai revised

2008

Southwestern Tai (SWT) is the best studied among the three main branches of the Tai language family according to Li (1960)’s classification. Because discrepancies among earlier proposals (Brown 1985; Jonsson 1991; Li 1977; and Sarawit 1973) are major obstacles both in subgrouping SWT varieties and in reconstructing PT, this paper