Center of Excellence in Southeast Asian Linguistics
Pittayawat Pittayaporn

Selected Publications

Reconstructing the Human Genetic History of Mainland Southeast Asia: Insights from Genome-Wide Data from Thailand and Laos

Thailand and Laos, located in the center of Mainland Southeast Asia (MSEA), harbor diverse ethnolinguistic groups encompassing all five language families of MSEA: Tai-Kadai (TK), Austroasiatic (AA), Sino-Tibetan (ST), Hmong-Mien (HM), and Austronesian (AN). Previous genetic studies of Thai/Lao populations have focused almost exclusively on uniparental markers and there is

Documentation of Moklenic languages

Moken and Moklen are languages spoken by two of Thailand’s three “Sea Peoples” groups, with speakers located along the coast of the southern Thai peninsula. As one of the few Austronesian subgroups of Mainland Southeast Asia, Moklenic languages serve as an additional example of the linguistic diversity of the region

Linguistic variation and social dynamics in languages of Southeast Asia

Language is inextricably linked to daily human life as a social phenomenon. Therefore, social dynamics bring about ongoing linguistic variation. Using traditional and experimental methods, research here aims to look at how the linguistic variation of Southeast Asian languages relates to a dynamic ways of life, attitudes, and societal fluidity.

Probabilistic Measures for Diffusion of Linguistic Innovation: As Seen in the Usage of Verbal “Nok” in Thai Twitter

The existence of several SNS (social networking service) such as Twitter accelerates the diffusion process of language change. In this paper, we examine the diffusion of the innovative verbal usage of nok in Thai Twitter. We collected more than 25 millions tweets and adopted not only word frequency but also three probabilistic measures of analysis: conditional probability, PMI and cosine similarity of word embeddings. The result of these three probabilistic measures show the stability of the innovation regardless of decrease of word frequency. These facts support the idea that the innovation nok is lexically established in Thai language. Most importantly, it shows that the three probabilistic measures can be used to quantify diffusion of linguistic innovation regardless of its polysemy.

Quantitative and qualitative restrictions on the distribution of lexical tones in Thai

In present-day Thai, contour tones show a more restricted distribution in comparison with level tones that cannot be explained by syllable structure alone. This diachronic study argues that both quantitative and qualitative restrictions are responsible for the puzzling gaps and accounts for them by positing Optimality-Theoretic constraints. In addition, it